Comparative Analysis Uses Weighted Product (WP) And Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods In The Best Graduation Selection System

jurnal sebatik

A. Sidiq Purnomo
Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Anief Fauzan Rozi
Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta

Abstrak :

Determination of students in the Study Program of the Information System of Mercu Buana University in Yogyakarta is still in the process of the decision. This is because it has not maximized the use of technology to use existing data in decision making. This assessment uses 6 criteria that are used as parameters in conducting experiments, in order to make the right decisions in this study, namely Multiple Attribute Decision Making(MADM) Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP). Based on the data that has been tested using the system, the system can be used properly by ranking results based on the highest value. The test results for the speed of access time obtained values of 1362.90 ms for SAW and 672.60 ms for WP. While the test results using Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) obtained a value of 8,2004 for SAW and 10.1868% for WP. In this case using the WP method is more because it is more optimal.

Identitas Jurnal :

Nama Jurnal:Jurnal Sebatik
Vol:Vol. 23, No. 1, Juni 2019, ISSN : 2621-069X, Hal. 44-52
View Resource:

Referensi :

  • Bajandoh, F. H. & Hidayati, R., 2018. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Siswa Lulusan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Promethee (Studi Kasus SMA Negeri 3 Pontianak). Jurnal Coding, Vol. 06, No. 03 (2018), pp. 227-236.
  • Kusrini, 2007. Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  • Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A. & Wardoyo, R., 2006. Fuzzy Multi- Atribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
  • Lailiyah, S., Salmon & Haeda, N., 2016. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Anak Asuh Pena Prestasi Menggunakan Metode Saw (Simple Additive Weighting) Pada Lembaga Amil Zakat Dana Peduli Ummat Kalimantan Timur. Sebatik, 15(1), pp. 25-30.
  • Rini, P. P., Dedi & Riyanti, N., 2015. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Terbaik Berbasis Web Dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) (Studi Kasus: STMIK Global Tangerang). Jurnal SISFOTEK Global, Vol. 5, No. 2, September 2015, ISSN : 2088 – 1762, pp. 100-108.
  • Savitha, K. & Chandrasekar, C., 2011. Vertical Handover decision schemes using SAW and WPM for Network selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol. 11 No. 9, Version 1.0 May 2011, ISSN : 0975-4172, Print ISSN: 0975-4350, 11(9), pp. 18-24.
  • Septian, M. R. N. & Purnomo, A. S., 2017. Sistem Penilaian Pegawai Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) dan Weighted Product (WP). Jurnal Multimedia & Artificial Intelligence (JMAI), Vol. 1, No. 1, ISSN : 2580-2593, 1(1), pp. 27-33.
  • Setyawan, A., Arini, F. Y. & Akhlis, I., 2017. Comparative Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method and Weighted Product Method to New Employee Recruitment Decision Support System (DSS) at PT. Warta Media Nusantara. Scientific Journal of Informatics, Vol. 4, No. 1, May 2017, e-ISSN : 2460-0040, p-ISSN : 2407-7658, pp. 34-42.
  • Sugiyono, 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  • Turban, E., Aronson, J. E. & Liang, T. P., 2005. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas), Edisi 7. Jilid 1. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  • Wijaya, A. H. & Mustafidah, H., 2015. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Lulusan Mahasiswa Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. Purwokerto, s.n.
  • Yoni, D. C. & Mustafidah, H., 2016. Penerapan Metode WP (Weighted Product) Untuk Pemilihan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik Di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. JUITA, Vol. IV, No. 1, Mei 2016, ISSN:2086-9398, IV(1), pp. 22-27.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *